Ryzen 3 4300G vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1018 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.90 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 38 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 June 2008 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has 85.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 4300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 4300G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 3 4300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
