Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Turion X2 RM-75

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD TurionIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134
Current price$21 no data

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus support4000 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Turion X2 RM-75 670
+39%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

Turion X2 RM-75 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 39% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Turion X2 RM-75 1717
+37.4%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250

Turion X2 RM-75 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 37% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Turion X2 RM-75 3390
+42.4%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

Turion X2 RM-75 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 42% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 1 September 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-75 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Turion X2 RM-75
Turion X2 RM-75
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-75 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-75 or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.