Ryzen 7 7840U vs Turion X2 RM-74

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-74
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.42
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
14.05
+3245%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Turion X2 RM-74 by a whopping 3245% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3179559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD TurionAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency0.5121.21
DesignerAMDAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 January 2009 (16 years ago)May 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FP8
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5600

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Turion X2 RM-74 0.42
Ryzen 7 7840U 14.05
+3245%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 RM-74 1740
Ryzen 7 7840U 6669
+283%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 RM-74 3380
Ryzen 7 7840U 38490
+1039%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 RM-74 1561
Ryzen 7 7840U 12482
+700%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 14.05
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 7840U has a 3245.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 RM-74 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 32 votes

Rate Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 323 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion X2 RM-74 and Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.