EPYC 7282 vs Turion X2 RM-74
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7282 outperforms Turion X2 RM-74 by a whopping 3979% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3194 | 417 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 12.70 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 0.51 | 6.03 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) | 7 August 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $650 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-74 and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 28 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB (per die) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 2x 74 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 7,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-74 and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | S1 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Eight-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 204.763 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and EPYC 7282.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.42 | 17.13 |
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 7 August 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 2 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 120 Watt |
Turion X2 RM-74 has 242.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7282, on the other hand, has a 3978.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD EPYC 7282 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion X2 RM-74 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 RM-74 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7282 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
