Celeron 3865U vs Turion X2 RM-74

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon X2 QL-60 Athlon X2 QL-62 Athlon X2 QL-64 Athlon X2 QL-65 Turion X2 RM-74
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Celeron 3205U Celeron 3215U Celeron 3765U Celeron 3855U Celeron 3865U Celeron 3867U Celeron 3955U Celeron 3965U Celeron 3965Y

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 RM-74
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
Celeron 3865U
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.84
+82.6%

Celeron 3865U outperforms Turion X2 RM-74 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29422590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD TurionIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.245.30
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Kaby Lake-U (2017)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate3600 MHz4 GT/s
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.7 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1FCBGA1356,FPBGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+

Security technologies

Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data32 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data900 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data10

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 RM-74 0.46
Celeron 3865U 0.84
+82.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 RM-74 1740
Celeron 3865U 2853
+64%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 RM-74 3380
Celeron 3865U 5425
+60.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.46 0.84
Recency 1 January 2009 3 January 2017
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 3865U has a 82.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3865U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 RM-74 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-74 and Celeron 3865U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

AMD Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74
Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
Celeron B815 Celeron B815
Celeron 3865U Celeron 3865U
vs
Pentium Dual T4500 Pentium Dual Core T4500
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
i7-3667U Core i7 3667U
vs
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
Celeron 1000M Celeron 1000M
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
Core 2 Duo T7400 Core 2 Duo T7400
i7-2715QE Core i7 2715QE
vs
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
Celeron N4100 Celeron N4100
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
i3-8121U Core i3 8121U
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
i5-10210U Core i5 10210U
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
i3-10110U Core i3 10110U
i7-5850EQ Core i7 5850EQ
vs
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
Turion X2 RM-74 Turion X2 RM-74
vs
i5-10400H Core i5 10400H

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 31 vote

Rate Turion X2 RM-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 RM-74 or Celeron 3865U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.