Celeron N3050 vs Turion X2 RM-70
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 2x AMD Turion | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Braswell (2015−2016) |
Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 April 2015 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | no data | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.16 GHz |
Bus type | no data | IDI |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | S1 | FCBGA1170 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Smart Response | no data | - |
GPIO | no data | + |
Smart Connect | no data | - |
HD Audio | no data | + |
RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Boot | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
OS Guard | no data | - |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
VT-i | no data | - |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for Intel® Celeron® Processor N3000 Series |
Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 600 MHz |
Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | + |
OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 5 |
Integrated LAN | no data | - |
UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 3 June 2008 | 1 April 2015 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 6 Watt |
Celeron N3050 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 416.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-70 and Celeron N3050, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.