A4-3320M vs Turion X2 RM-70
Aggregate performance score
Turion X2 RM-70 outperforms A4-3320M by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2979 | 3011 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 20 December 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 228 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | FS1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.44 | 0.42 |
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 20 December 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 35 Watt |
Turion X2 RM-70 has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 12.9% lower power consumption.
A4-3320M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 RM-70 and A4-3320M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
