Ryzen 7 8700F vs Turion Neo X2 L625

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion Neo X2 L625
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.42
+7093%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Turion Neo X2 L625 by a whopping 7093% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3126289
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data52.50
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion Neono data
Power efficiencyno data28.27
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1 BGAAM5
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protectionno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion Neo X2 L625 0.27
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.42
+7093%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion Neo X2 L625 432
Ryzen 7 8700F 30854
+7042%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 19.42
Recency 1 October 2009 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 65 Watt

Turion Neo X2 L625 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has a 7092.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion Neo X2 L625 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion Neo X2 L625 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion Neo X2 L625
Turion Neo X2 L625
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion Neo X2 L625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 187 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion Neo X2 L625 or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.