Mobile Sempron M100 vs Turion Neo X2 L625
Aggregate performance score
Turion Neo X2 L625 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3126 | 3188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Neo | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.42 | 0.83 |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 1 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | ASB1 BGA | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
Turion Neo X2 L625 has a 22.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 38.9% lower power consumption.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Turion Neo X2 L625 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
