Celeron SU2300 vs Turion Neo X2 L625
Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3384 | 3392 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Neo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.61 | 1.11 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Congo (2009) | no data |
| Release date | 1 October 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 2 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | ASB1 BGA | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron SU2300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Celeron SU2300 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2009 | 1 July 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 10 Watt |
Turion Neo X2 L625 has an age advantage of 3 months.
Celeron SU2300, on the other hand, has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Turion Neo X2 L625 and Intel Celeron SU2300.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
