Athlon Neo MV-40 vs Turion Neo X2 L625

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion Neo X2 L625
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.27
+58.8%
Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.17

Turion Neo X2 L625 outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion Neo X2 L625 and Athlon Neo MV-40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31263260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion NeoAMD Athlon Neo
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Huron (2009)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion Neo X2 L625 and Athlon Neo MV-40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz1600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion Neo X2 L625 and Athlon Neo MV-40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1 BGAASB1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Athlon Neo MV-40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHyperTransport 3.0, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus ProtectionMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion Neo X2 L625 and Athlon Neo MV-40 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion Neo X2 L625 0.27
+58.8%
Athlon Neo MV-40 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion Neo X2 L625 432
+57.1%
Athlon Neo MV-40 275

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion Neo X2 L625 1313
+3.1%
Athlon Neo MV-40 1274

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion Neo X2 L625 2538
+121%
Athlon Neo MV-40 1149

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion Neo X2 L625 1167
+90.1%
Athlon Neo MV-40 614

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion Neo X2 L625 53
+92.5%
Athlon Neo MV-40 102

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.17
Recency 1 October 2009 6 January 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 15 Watt

Turion Neo X2 L625 has a 58.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon Neo MV-40, on the other hand, has 20% lower power consumption.

The Turion Neo X2 L625 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion Neo X2 L625 and Athlon Neo MV-40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion Neo X2 L625
Turion Neo X2 L625
AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Turion Neo X2 L625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion Neo X2 L625 or Athlon Neo MV-40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.