Core 2 Duo U7600 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35
+59.1%
Core 2 Duo U7600
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.22

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Core 2 Duo U7600 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30453187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency3.312.08
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Merom-2048 (2006−2008)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)27 July 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache3 MB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.8V-0.975V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 0.35
+59.1%
Core 2 Duo U7600 0.22

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1496
+18.4%
Core 2 Duo U7600 1263

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 2813
+22.9%
Core 2 Duo U7600 2289

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1178
+16.9%
Core 2 Duo U7600 1008

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 61.3
+11.9%
Core 2 Duo U7600 68.6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.22
Recency 1 September 2009 27 July 2006
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 59.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo U7600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Core 2 Duo U7600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300
Intel Core 2 Duo U7600
Core 2 Duo U7600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo U7600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU7300 or Core 2 Duo U7600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.