EPYC 7H12 vs Turion II P540

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Turion II P540
2010
2 cores / 2 threads
0.65
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.02
+6826%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Turion II P540 by 6826% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking262138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data22.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Turion IIAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date12 May 2010 (13 years ago)18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$28 $1970

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus support3600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketS1 (S1g4)TR4
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, HyperTransport 3.0, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controllerno data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion II P540 0.65
EPYC 7H12 45.02
+6826%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Turion II P540 by 6826% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Turion II P540 1002
EPYC 7H12 69633
+6849%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Turion II P540 by 6849% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.65 45.02
Recency 12 May 2010 18 September 2019
Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II P540 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion II P540 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7H12 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II P540 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II P540
Turion II P540
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 28 votes

Rate Turion II P540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II P540 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.