Core i5-13400F vs Turion II Neo K685

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data19.19
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Turion II Neono data
Architecture codenameGeneva (2010)Raptor Lake-S
Release date15 December 2010 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$196
Current priceno data$675 (3.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus support3200 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsintegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, VirtualizationIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
VirusProtect+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Turion II Neo K685 684
i5-13400F 25224
+3588%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by 3588% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Turion II Neo K685 1424
i5-13400F 8689
+510%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by 510% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Turion II Neo K685 3083
i5-13400F 51113
+1558%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by 1558% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Turion II Neo K685 1451
i5-13400F 13989
+864%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by 864% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Turion II Neo K685 42
i5-13400F 3.27
+1184%

Turion II Neo K685 outperforms Core i5-13400F by 1184% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Turion II Neo K685 1
i5-13400F 27
+2566%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Turion II Neo K685 by 2566% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2010 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 10
Threads 2 16
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Turion II Neo K685 is a notebook processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion II Neo K685 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion II Neo K685
Turion II Neo K685
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Turion II Neo K685 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2674 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion II Neo K685 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.