Athlon X2 L310 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion 64 | 2x AMD Athlon |
| Architecture codename | Trinidad/Tyler (2007) | Conesus (2009) |
| Release date | 4 May 2007 (17 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 147 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 154 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1 | BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35/31 Watt | 13 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 90/65 nm, 1.075 | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 May 2007 | 10 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 13 Watt |
Athlon X2 L310 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 169.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
