AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60 vs A9-9425

AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
AMD A9-9425

General info

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
Place in performance rating
2x AMD Turion 64
AMD Bristol Ridge
Achitecture codename
Trinidad / Tyler
Stoney Ridge
Release date
4 May 2007
1 June 2016

Technical specs

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Maximum frequency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Bus support
800 MHz
L1 cache
256 KB
L2 cache
1024 KB
1 MB
Manufacturing process technology
90 / 65 nm
28 nm
Die size
147 mm2
124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature
95 °C
90 °C
Transistor count
154 Million
1200 Million
64 bit support


Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
35 / 31 Watt
10-25 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

Graphics specifications

General parameters of GPUs integrated into Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425.
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall benchmark performance

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 8.37 +61%
A9-9425 5.20

3DMark06 CPU

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1457
A9-9425 2314 +58.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 1619
A9-9425 2686 +65.9%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 3130
A9-9425 4338 +38.6%

wPrime 32

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 39
A9-9425 26 +51%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.

Advantages of AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60

61% faster (about 1.5 times) in synthetic tests

Advantages of AMD A9-9425

Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 4 May 2007)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 90 nm)
Less power hungry (10 vs 35 watts)
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)

So, Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or A9-9425?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and A9-9425, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favourite CPU.
AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
AMD A9-9425

User rating

Here you can see the rating of the processor by users, as well as give your rating.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.