Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Turion 64 MT-30
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U outperforms Turion 64 MT-30 by a whopping 6272% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 MT-30 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3248 | 678 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 0.68 | 72.37 |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 MT-30 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 MT-30 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-30 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 11.47 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U has a 6272.2% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2150% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-30 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MT-30 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
