Opteron 3350 HE vs Turion 64 MT-28

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MT-28
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 512 Watt
0.16
Opteron 3350 HE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.53
+856%

Opteron 3350 HE outperforms Turion 64 MT-28 by a whopping 856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking35592330
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesTurion 64no data
Power efficiencyno data3.65
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release dateJune 2005 (20 years ago)4 December 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache512 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm32 nm
Die size125 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors114 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)512 KB45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 1.53
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 512 Watt 45 Watt

Opteron 3350 HE has a 856.3% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1037.8% lower power consumption.

The AMD Opteron 3350 HE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Turion 64 MT-28 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 MT-28 is a notebook processor while Opteron 3350 HE is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-28
Turion 64 MT-28
AMD Opteron  3350 HE
Opteron 3350 HE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-28 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Opteron 3350 HE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 MT-28 and Opteron 3350 HE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.