Itanium 9152M vs Athlon 64 TF-20
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3578 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon 64 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Sherman (2009) | no data |
| Release date | 1 May 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Itanium 9152M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 1 | no data |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.66 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 0.1 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB L3 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 76 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 TF-20 and Itanium 9152M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | S1g1 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 104 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Itanium 9152M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FSB parity | no data | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 64 TF-20 and Itanium 9152M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 TF-20 and Itanium 9152M are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 May 2009 | 1 October 2007 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 104 Watt |
Athlon 64 TF-20 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Itanium 9152M, on the other hand, has 392.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Athlon 64 TF-20 and Intel Itanium 9152M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook processor while Itanium 9152M is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
