Trace: try redirect_from
Trace: select _id, title from ss_cpu where redirect_to=827
Ryzen 7 2700X vs Turion 64 MK-36
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 671 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 10.22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Turion 64 | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Architecture codename | Richmond | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | no data | 13 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $329 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 37 |
| L1 cache | no data | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | AM4 (1331) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 105 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 105 Watt |
Turion 64 MK-36 has 238.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 2700X, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Turion 64 MK-36 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 2700X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MK-36 and Ryzen 7 2700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
