Xeon X5675 vs Steam Deck OLED APU

VS

Aggregate performance score

Steam Deck OLED APU
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.61
+14.4%
Xeon X5675
2011
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
4.03

Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms Xeon X5675 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12901410
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.80
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency29.094.01
Architecture codenameVan Gogh (Custom) (2023)Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date9 November 2023 (1 year ago)14 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$162

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.46 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB12288 KB (shared)
Chip lithography6 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data239 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataFCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data40 Bit

Security technologies

Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data288 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.61 4.03
Recency 9 November 2023 14 February 2011
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 6 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Steam Deck OLED APU has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon X5675, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5675 in performance tests.

Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and Xeon X5675, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
Steam Deck OLED APU
Intel Xeon X5675
Xeon X5675

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Steam Deck OLED APU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 632 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Steam Deck OLED APU or Xeon X5675, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.