Pentium M 738 vs Sempron LE-1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron LE-1300
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.26
+100%
Pentium M 738
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.13

Sempron LE-1300 outperforms Pentium M 738 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31363325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataPentium M
Power efficiency0.551.23
Architecture codenameSparta (2007)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$12no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.13
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

Sempron LE-1300 has a 100% higher aggregate performance score, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 350% lower power consumption.

The Sempron LE-1300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 738 in performance tests.

Note that Sempron LE-1300 is a desktop processor while Pentium M 738 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron LE-1300
Sempron LE-1300
Intel Pentium M 738
Pentium M 738

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 30 votes

Rate Sempron LE-1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Pentium M 738 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron LE-1300 or Pentium M 738, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.