Pentium M 738 vs Sempron LE-1300
Primary details
Comparing Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Pentium M |
| Architecture codename | Sparta (2007) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | October 2007 (17 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM2 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 10 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 10 Watt |
Sempron LE-1300 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium M 738, on the other hand, has 350% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron LE-1300 is a desktop processor while Pentium M 738 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron LE-1300 and Pentium M 738, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
