Ryzen 5 2500X vs Sempron 3600+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1059 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 5 |
Architecture codename | Manila (2001−2006) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
Release date | May 2006 (18 years ago) | 10 September 2018 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 36 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 256K | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
Die size | 103 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 81 million | 4800 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | AM2 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 46.933 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 65 Watt |
Sempron 3600+ has 4.8% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 2500X, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3600+ and Ryzen 5 2500X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.