Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Sempron 3500+ EE SFF

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Architecture codenameManila (2001−2006)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)17 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB768 KB
L2 cache128 KB12 MB
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Die size103 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors81 million9900 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2FL1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 24
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

Sempron 3500+ EE SFF has 57.1% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7840HX, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 3500+ EE SFF is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 7840HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3500+ EE SFF and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 3500+ EE SFF
Sempron 3500+ EE SFF
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
Ryzen 9 7840HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Sempron 3500 EE SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 9 7840HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 3500+ EE SFF or Ryzen 9 7840HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.