Celeron 927UE vs Sempron 3200+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Palermo (2001−2005) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 October 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $13 | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 103 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 939 | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2005 | 1 January 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron 927UE has an age advantage of 7 years, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 264.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 3200+ is a desktop processor while Celeron 927UE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3200+ and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
