Core i7-8665U vs Core i5-4200H

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i5-4200H
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 47 Watt
1.99
Core i7-8665U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.04
+103%

i7-8665U outperforms i5-4200H by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18931387
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i7
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)16 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$257$409

Detailed specifications

Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rateno data4 GT/s
Multiplierno data19
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MB8 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size130 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors960 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1364BGA1528
Power consumption (TDP)47 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Hyper-Threading Technology++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel UHD Graphics 620

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i5-4200H 1.99
i7-8665U 4.04
+103%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i5-4200H 3085
i7-8665U 6249
+103%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i5-4200H 988
+29.2%
i7-8665U 765

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i5-4200H 1897
i7-8665U 2425
+27.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i5-4200H 5719
i7-8665U 6872
+20.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i5-4200H 10739
i7-8665U 18427
+71.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i5-4200H 4361
i7-8665U 6365
+46%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i5-4200H 15.77
i7-8665U 9.98
+58%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i5-4200H 4
i7-8665U 5
+38.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i5-4200H 324
i7-8665U 670
+107%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i5-4200H 130
i7-8665U 180
+39%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i5-4200H 1.46
i7-8665U 1.67
+14.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i5-4200H 1.9
i7-8665U 2.6
+36.8%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i5-4200H 2469
i7-8665U 3418
+38.4%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i5-4200H 20
i7-8665U 32
+56.5%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i5-4200H 103
i7-8665U 139
+35%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

i5-4200H 5977
i7-8665U 14277
+139%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

i5-4200H 2799
i7-8665U 3887
+38.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 4.04
Integrated graphics card 1.84 2.67
Recency 1 October 2013 16 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 47 Watt 15 Watt

i7-8665U has a 103% higher aggregate performance score, 45.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

The Core i7-8665U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5-4200H in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i5-4200H and Core i7-8665U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i5-4200H
Core i5-4200H
Intel Core i7-8665U
Core i7-8665U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 93 votes

Rate Core i5-4200H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 176 votes

Rate Core i7-8665U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i5-4200H or Core i7-8665U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.