Mobile Sempron 4000+ vs Sempron 2200+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 2200+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3350 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 0.18 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Sherman (2009) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 2200+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 2200+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | A | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 31 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 31 Watt |
Mobile Sempron 4000+ has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 2200+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Sempron 2200+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron 4000+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2200+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
