Celeron 2.80 vs Sempron 2200+

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

Comparing Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 2.80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2003)Northwood (2001−2004)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)November 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$30no data
Current price$30 (1x MSRP)$115

Detailed Specifications

Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 2.80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache256 KB128 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography130 nm130 nm
Die size101 mm2146 mm2
Number of transistors63 million55 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 2.80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketA478
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt73 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 2.80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Sempron 2200+ 184
Celeron 2.80 190
+3.3%

Celeron 2.80 outperforms Sempron 2200+ by 3% in Passmark.

Pros & Cons Summary


Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 73 Watt

We couldn't decide between Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 2.80. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 2.80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2200+
Sempron 2200+
Intel Celeron 2.80
Celeron 2.80

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 10 votes

Rate Sempron 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 9 votes

Rate Celeron 2.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2200+ or Celeron 2.80, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.