Processor N97 vs Sempron 150
Aggregate performance score
Processor N97 outperforms Sempron 150 by a whopping 818% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 150 and Processor N97 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3035 | 1544 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 0.80 | 27.52 |
Architecture codename | Sargas (2009−2011) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 7 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $73 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 150 and Processor N97 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 117 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Number of transistors | 234 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 150 and Processor N97 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | Intel BGA 1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 12 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 150 and Processor N97. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Sempron 150 and Processor N97 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 150 and Processor N97 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 150 and Processor N97. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 150 and Processor N97.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.38 | 3.49 |
Recency | 7 December 2010 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 12 Watt |
Processor N97 has a 818.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.
The Processor N97 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 150 in performance tests.
Note that Sempron 150 is a desktop processor while Processor N97 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 150 and Processor N97, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.