Apple M1 vs Ryzen 5 1600X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.22
+59%

Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Apple M1 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9141192
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.42no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Apple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency8.19no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache96K (per core)2 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 million16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Apple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.22
+59%
Apple M1 5.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600X 13056
+59.1%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.22 5.17
Recency 11 April 2017 10 November 2020
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Ryzen 5 1600X has a 59% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 33.3% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 1600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 899 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2233 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.