EPYC 9455 vs Sempron 130

VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3092not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.67no data
Architecture codenameSargas (2009−2011)Turin (2024)
Release date1 August 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$25$5,412

Detailed specifications

Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads196
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.15 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size117 mm26x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors234 million49,890 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3SP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 1 48
Threads 1 96
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

Sempron 130 has 566.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 4700% more physical cores and 9500% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Sempron 130 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 130 and EPYC 9455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 130
Sempron 130
AMD EPYC 9455
EPYC 9455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 9 votes

Rate Sempron 130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 130 or EPYC 9455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.