Xeon D-2712T vs Samsung Exynos 850
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-2712T outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by a whopping 286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2164 | 1136 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Samsung | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A55 (2019) | no data |
| Release date | 15 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| L3 cache | no data | 15 MB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon D-2712T outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon D-2712T outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 286% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.34 | 5.17 |
| Recency | 15 May 2020 | 1 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 10 nm |
The Xeon D-2712T is our recommended choice as it beats the Samsung Exynos 850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Samsung Exynos 850 is a notebook processor while Xeon D-2712T is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Samsung Exynos 850 and Xeon D-2712T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
