Ryzen 5 5600G vs Samsung Exynos 850
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by a whopping 860% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2164 | 555 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 13 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 87.22 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Samsung | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A55 (2019) | Cezanne (2021−2022) |
| Release date | 15 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 13 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $259 |
| Current price | no data | $106 (0.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | AM4 (1331) mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | ARM Mali-G52 MP1 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 860% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Samsung Exynos 850 by 861% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.34 | 12.86 |
| Recency | 15 May 2020 | 13 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 8 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 7 nm |
The Ryzen 5 5600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Samsung Exynos 850 in performance tests.
Be aware that Samsung Exynos 850 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 5600G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Samsung Exynos 850 and Ryzen 5 5600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
