Xeon Gold 6208U vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
61.77
+252%
Xeon Gold 6208U
2020
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
17.56

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX outperforms Xeon Gold 6208U by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)no data
Release date19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)1 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache128 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography5 nm14 nm
Die size4x 71 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Number of transistors26,280 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsTR5FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Statusno dataLaunched
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 61.77
+252%
Xeon Gold 6208U 17.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95247
+252%
Xeon Gold 6208U 27085

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 61.77 17.56
Recency 19 October 2023 1 January 2020
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 150 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has a 251.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon Gold 6208U, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6208U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Xeon Gold 6208U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Intel Xeon Gold 6208U
Xeon Gold 6208U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 17 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6208U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or Xeon Gold 6208U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.