EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
59.56
+12.8%
EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
52.82

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX outperforms EPYC 9534 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1929
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.152.62
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.1817.93
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899$8,803

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has 364% better value for money than EPYC 9534.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed4 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data24.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 71 mm28x 72 mm2
Number of transistors26,280 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketsTR5SP5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 59.56
+12.8%
EPYC 9534 52.82

  • Passmark

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95421
+12.7%
EPYC 9534 84631

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 59.56 52.82
Recency 19 October 2023 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 280 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

EPYC 9534, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9534 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5
21 vote

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and EPYC 9534, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.