EPYC 9534 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
48.53
EPYC 9534
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
60.23
+24.1%

EPYC 9534 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4018
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.70
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency16.1019.98
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,803

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads64128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.45 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.45 GHz
Multiplier3624.5
L1 cache2 MB4 MB
L2 cache16 MB64 MB
L3 cache128 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size4x 81 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors16,600 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketWRX8SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size2 TiB6 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes128128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 48.53
EPYC 9534 60.23
+24.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 75654
EPYC 9534 93884
+24.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.53 60.23
Recency 8 March 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 64
Threads 64 128
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

EPYC 9534 has a 24.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9534 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and EPYC 9534, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
AMD EPYC 9534
EPYC 9534

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 34 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9534 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX or EPYC 9534, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.