FX-4170 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
2022
12 cores / 24 threads, 280 Watt
26.32
+1236%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX outperforms FX-4170 by a whopping 1236% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1841930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)27 February 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads244
Base clock speed4.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.3 GHz
Multiplier41no data
L1 cache768 KB192 KB
L2 cache6 MB4096 KB
L3 cache64 MB8192 KB
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors16,600 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketWRX8AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR3
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170.

PCIe version4.0n/a
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX 26.32
+1236%
FX-4170 1.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX 40579
+1237%
FX-4170 3034

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX 2054
+343%
FX-4170 464

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX 13202
+999%
FX-4170 1201

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.32 1.97
Recency 8 March 2022 27 February 2012
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 4
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 125 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX has a 1236% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

FX-4170, on the other hand, has 124% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4170 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is a server/workstation processor while FX-4170 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX and FX-4170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
AMD FX-4170
FX-4170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 9 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 75 votes

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX or FX-4170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.