EPYC 9174F vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
41.25
+13.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms EPYC 9174F by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking64104
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.626.69
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency13.4310.33
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$3,850

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 133% better value for money than EPYC 9174F.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads6432
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier3741
L1 cache96K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache128 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data8x 72 mm2
Number of transistors19,200 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketTR4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size256 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 41.25
+13.8%
EPYC 9174F 36.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63128
+13.8%
EPYC 9174F 55485

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1661
EPYC 9174F 2214
+33.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13790
EPYC 9174F 16965
+23%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.25 36.26
Recency 25 November 2019 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 16
Threads 64 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 320 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9174F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 9174F in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while EPYC 9174F is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and EPYC 9174F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD EPYC 9174F
EPYC 9174F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 347 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 9174F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or EPYC 9174F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.