Celeron J1900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.89
+5426%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 5426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking542571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date25 November 2019 (4 years ago)1 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$82
Current price$1605 (0.8x MSRP)$163 (2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads644
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.42 GHz
Bus support8 × 16 GT/sno data
L1 cache96K (per core)224 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache128 MB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors19,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
SIPPno data-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
Statusno dataLaunched
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-854 MHz
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 40.89
+5426%
Celeron J1900 0.74

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 5426% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 63242
+5399%
Celeron J1900 1150

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 5399% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 1636
+846%
Celeron J1900 173

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 846% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X 13986
+2590%
Celeron J1900 520

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Celeron J1900 by 2590% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.89 0.74
Recency 25 November 2019 1 November 2013
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 4
Cost $1999 $82
Chip lithography 7 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 10 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a desktop processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 343 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 184 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3970X or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.