Atom 230 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperIntel Atom
Power efficiency9.14no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date13 July 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999$29

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads322
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier3412
L1 cache1.5 MB56 KB
L2 cache8 MB512 KB
L3 cache32 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm225.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C85 °C
Number of transistors9600 Million47 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE4.2, SSE4A, AMD-V, AES, AVX2, FMA3, SHAIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiB8 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 27606
+16235%
Atom 230 169

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 4754
+754%
Atom 230 557

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 41814
+4814%
Atom 230 851

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 July 2017 2 April 2008
Physical cores 16 1
Threads 32 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 4 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has an age advantage of 9 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 230, on the other hand, has 4400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a desktop processor while Atom 230 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Atom 230, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Intel Atom 230
Atom 230

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 145 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 55 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Atom 230, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.