Xeon Platinum 8376HL vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 524 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 7.31 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 32 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 38.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4.5 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 28 |
| Threads | 32 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 205 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 13.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8376HL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8376HL is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1950 and Xeon Platinum 8376HL, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
