Athlon 64 3100+ vs Ryzen Threadripper 1940
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | April 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | 122 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 14 | 1 |
| Threads | 28 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1940 has 1300% more physical cores and 2700% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 3100+, on the other hand, has 620% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1940 and Athlon 64 3100+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
