Xeon D-1627 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1930X

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon D
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$202

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data8
Base clock speedno data2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache32768 KB6 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSP3r2FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
QuickAssistno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
AMTno dataSPS 3.0
Quiet Systemno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627.

PCIe versionno data2.0/3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x 10 GBE
UARTno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 12 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 1930X has 200% more physical cores.

Xeon D-1627, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1930X is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1627 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1930X and Xeon D-1627, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1930X
Ryzen Threadripper 1930X
Intel Xeon D-1627
Xeon D-1627

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1930X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1627 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1930X or Xeon D-1627, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.