EPYC 7713P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.93
EPYC 7713P
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.10
+249%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking44027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.0914.67
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date13 July 2017 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799$5,010
Current price$260 (0.3x MSRP)$3229 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 30% better value for money than EPYC 7713P.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.68 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.125 MB4 MB
L2 cache6 MB32 MB
L3 cache32 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size213 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors9600 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSP3r2SP3
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes60128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 14.93
EPYC 7713P 52.10
+249%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X by 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 23100
EPYC 7713P 80589
+249%

EPYC 7713P outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X by 249% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.93 52.10
Recency 13 July 2017 12 January 2021
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Cost $799 $5010
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 225 Watt

The EPYC 7713P is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is a desktop processor while EPYC 7713P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and EPYC 7713P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
AMD EPYC 7713P
EPYC 7713P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 367 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate EPYC 7713P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1920X or EPYC 7713P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.