Xeon W-1290 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Xeon W-1290 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 460 | 530 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.90 | 19.90 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 29 July 2017 (6 years ago) | 13 May 2020 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $270 | $803 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-1290 has 11% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper 1920.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 206 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | SP3r2 | FCLGA1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 45.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics P630 |
| Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2160@30Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 10% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 14.27 | 12.98 |
| Recency | 29 July 2017 | 13 May 2020 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 10 |
| Threads | 24 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 80 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1290 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Xeon W-1290, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
