i7-7510U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 529 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
Power efficiency | 9.39 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
Release date | 29 July 2017 (7 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 24 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
Bus type | no data | OPI |
Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 27 |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 32 MB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 9,600 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | SP3r2 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Quad-channel | LPDDR3-1866 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 12 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
Threads | 24 | 4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
i7-7510U, on the other hand, has 833.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop processor while Core i7-7510U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1920 and Core i7-7510U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.