Apple M1 Max vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 125 Watt
10.90

Apple M1 Max outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking712516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.44no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperApple M-Series
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)no data
Release date31 August 2017 (7 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1610
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.22 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache96K (per core)2.9 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache32 MB48 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die size213 mm2no data
Number of transistors9,600 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSP3r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)125 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Quad-channelno data
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes60no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 10.90
Apple M1 Max 14.31
+31.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 16802
Apple M1 Max 22064
+31.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.90 14.31
Recency 31 August 2017 18 October 2021
Physical cores 8 10
Threads 16 10
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X has 60% more threads.

Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has a 31.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 25% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Apple M1 Max is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 1900X and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 125 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 678 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 1900X or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.