Xeon Gold 6326 vs Ryzen Embedded V2748

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Embedded V2748
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
10.72
Xeon Gold 6326
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 185 Watt
22.63
+111%

Xeon Gold 6326 outperforms Ryzen Embedded V2748 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking735234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen Embeddedno data
Power efficiency22.1311.36
Architecture codenameRenoir (2020−2023)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier29no data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm10 nm
Die size156 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors9,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth68.269 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Graphics 448SPno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes2064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Embedded V2748 10.72
Xeon Gold 6326 22.63
+111%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Embedded V2748 16706
Xeon Gold 6326 35270
+111%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.72 22.63
Recency 10 November 2020 6 April 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 185 Watt

Ryzen Embedded V2748 has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 311.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6326, on the other hand, has a 111.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6326 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded V2748 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen Embedded V2748 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6326 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V2748 and Xeon Gold 6326, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Embedded V2748
Ryzen Embedded V2748
Intel Xeon Gold 6326
Xeon Gold 6326

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.8 15 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded V2748 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6326 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Embedded V2748 or Xeon Gold 6326, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.