Athlon MP 2200+ vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1377 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Embedded | AMD Athlon MP |
| Power efficiency | 26.50 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 27 August 2002 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $224 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 20 | 13.5 |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 85 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 27 August 2002 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded V1605B has an age advantage of 15 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Embedded V1605B is a desktop processor while Athlon MP 2200+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Embedded V1605B and Athlon MP 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
