Celeron 6205 vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 413 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Tiger Lake |
| Power efficiency | 13.89 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Strix Halo (2025−2026) | Tiger Lake U (2020) |
| Release date | no data | 1 September 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 2/2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 160 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 2.5 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | no data | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | BGA1499 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has 267% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
